Entry - #303900 - COLORBLINDNESS, PARTIAL, PROTAN SERIES; CBP - OMIM
# 303900

COLORBLINDNESS, PARTIAL, PROTAN SERIES; CBP


Alternative titles; symbols

PROTANOPIA
RED COLORBLINDNESS


Other entities represented in this entry:

PROTANOMALY, INCLUDED

Phenotype-Gene Relationships

Location Phenotype Phenotype
MIM number
Inheritance Phenotype
mapping key
Gene/Locus Gene/Locus
MIM number
Xq28 Colorblindness, protan 303900 XL 3 OPN1LW 300822
Clinical Synopsis
 

Eyes
- Colorblindness, partial, protan series
- Red series defect
Inheritance
- X-linked

TEXT

A number sign (#) is used with this entry because protan colorblindness is caused by mutation in the OPN1LW gene (300822), which encodes red cone pigment.


Description

Normal color vision in humans is trichromatic, being based on 3 classes of cone that are maximally sensitive to light at approximately 420 nm (blue cones; 613522), 530 nm (green cones; 300821), and 560 nm (red cones; 300822). Comparison by neural circuits of light absorption by the 3 classes of cone photoreceptors allows perception of red, yellow, green, and blue colors individually or in various combinations. Dichromatic color vision is severely defective color vision based on the use of only 2 types of photoreceptors, blue plus green (protanopia) or blue plus red (deuteranopia; see 303800). Anomalous trichromacy is trichromatic color vision based on a blue, green, and an anomalous red-like photoreceptor (protanomaly), or a blue, red, and an anomalous green-like photoreceptor (deuteranomaly). The color vision defect is generally mild but may in certain cases be severe. Common variation in red-green color vision exists among both normal and color-deficient individuals (review by Deeb, 2005).


Clinical Features

Studies using reflection densitometry and retinal microbeam experiments showed that 2 different pigments mediate red and green sensitivity. These are located in the cones, each cone containing only 1 type of pigment (Waaler, 1968).

Simunovic et al. (2001) examined red-green color-deficient subjects, a small sample of monochromats, and age-matched color-normal control subjects to determine whether color vision deficiency confers a selective advantage under scotopic conditions. They found no evidence that red-green color deficiency or monochromatism confers a selective advantage under scotopic conditions, including dark adaptation, scotopic visual field sensitivity, or performance on a scotopic perceptual task.


Diagnosis

The Nagel anomaloscope, used in determination of the type of colorblindness, consists of a viewing tube with a circular bipartite field, one half illuminated with yellow and the other half with a mixture of green and red. The yellow half is not variable except in brightness. The other half can be varied continuously from red to green. The subject's color sense is tested by having him mix colors in the variable half-field until he achieves a subjective match to the yellow field. Certain color combinations are considered normal whereas specific differences from the normal indicate the type and degree of anomalous color vision.

Ishihara plates alone are unreliable in distinguishing deutan and protan types. Although the Nagel anomaloscope is the 'last court of appeal' in making the differentiation, it is expensive, time-consuming, difficult for unsophisticated subjects, and, of course, not usable 'in the field.' Two 'book' tests, the Tokyo Medical College Test and the AO-HRR (Hardy-Rand-Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plates, especially when used together, probably represent the methods that are both the easiest and the most reliable available (Sloan, 1961). Identification of a small proportion of deutero-heterozygotes is possible by means of the luminosity quotient, determined by a modification of the Nagel anomaloscope designed by Crone. Most cases of proto-heterozygotes can be identified as such with a high degree of certainty using this method.


Molecular Genetics

Several early observations supported a 2-locus model for the common type of red-green colorblindness. First, the data on relative frequency of colorblindness in males and females collected in Norway by Waaler (1927) and in Switzerland by von Planta (1928) agreed with the values predicted by a 2-locus theory. Second, females, who by the nature of the color vision defect in their sons are known to carry genes for both types of colorblindness, usually do not show a defect in color vision (Brunner, 1932; Kondo, 1941; Franceschetti and Klein, 1957). Third, the pedigrees of Vanderdonck and Verriest (1960) and Siniscalco et al. (1964) indicated independent assortment of deutan and protan genes among the offspring of a doubly heterozygous female. And fourth, Filippi et al. (1977) observed linkage disequilibrium for G6PD/protan but not for G6PD/deutan.

Nathans et al. (1986, 1986) determined that whereas there is a single red pigment gene, green pigment genes vary in number among persons with normal color vision. The multiple green pigment genes are arranged in a head-to-tail tandem array. The existence of multiple green pigment genes in tandem array may explain why deutan colorblindness is more frequent than protan colorblindness. Furthermore, nonhomologous pairing and unequal crossing-over can explain the development of colorblindness. Gene conversion may also be involved. The green pigment genes vary in restriction pattern.

Drummond-Borg et al. (1988) demonstrated the use of molecular methods for defining the defects in red-green color vision in a family carrying 3 types of defects: protanomaly, deuteranomaly, and protanopia. In the protanomalous and protanopic males, the normal red pigment gene was replaced by a 5-prime red--3-prime green fusion gene. The protanomalous male had more red pigment DNA in his fusion gene than did the more severely affected protanopic individual. The deuteranomalous individual had 4 green pigment genes and one 5-prime green--3-prime red fusion gene. The findings support the proposal that most red-green color-vision defects arise as a result of unequal crossing-over between the red and green pigment genes. Differences in severity of color-vision defects associated with fusion genes appear to be the result of differences in crossover sites between the red and green pigment genes. In this family, 2 compound heterozygotes for color-vision defects who tested as normal by anomaloscopy were found to carry abnormal fusion genes. The explanation for normal color vision appears to have been the presence, in addition, of a normal red pigment gene on one chromosome and at least 1 normal green pigment gene on the other.

In a study of genotype-phenotype relationships in 64 color-defective males, Deeb et al. (1992) found that in most there was either a deletion of the green-pigment gene or the formation of 5-prime red-green hybrid genes or 5-prime green-red hybrid genes. Protan color-vision defects appeared always associated with 5-prime red-green hybrid genes. Carriers of single red-green hybrid genes with fusion in introns 1-4 were protanopes. However, carriers of hybrid genes with red-green fusions in introns 2, 3, or 4 in the presence of additional normal green genes manifested as either protanopes or protanomalous trichromats, with the majority being protanomalous. Deutan defects were associated with green-pigment gene deletions, with 5-prime green-red hybrid genes, or, rarely, with 5-prime green-red-green hybrid genes. Complete green-pigment gene deletions or green-red fusions in intron 1 were usually associated with deuteranopia, although Deeb et al. (1992) unexpectedly found 3 subjects with a single red-pigment gene and no green-pigment genes to be deuteranomalous trichromats. All but one of the other deuteranomalous subjects had green-red hybrid genes with intron 1, 2, 3, or 4 fusions, as well as several normal green-pigment genes. Amino acid differences in exon 5 largely determine whether a hybrid gene will be more redlike or more greenlike in phenotype. When phenotypic color-vision defects exist, the kind of defect, protan or deutan, can be predicted by molecular analysis. Red-green hybrid genes are probably always associated with protan color-vision defects, while the presence of green-red hybrid genes may not always manifest phenotypically with color-vision defects. Among a group of 129 Caucasian males who had been recruited as volunteers for a vision study, Deeb et al. (1992) found 4 subjects who had 5-prime green-red hybrid genes in addition to normal red- and green-pigment genes and demonstrated normal color vision as determined by anomaloscopy. It may be that green-red hybrid genes in a more distal, 3-prime position of a gene array that includes one or more normal green genes may not be expressed sufficiently to affect color vision measurably.

Although there are 15 amino acid differences between the MW (green) and LW (red) opsins, the greater part of the spectral shift in sensitivity is the result of substitutions at sites 180, 277, and 285, with 5 other sites having smaller effects. Site 180 (see 300822.0002) is polymorphic in both MW and LW opsin genes. The middlewave opsin is missing or defective in deuteranopia and the longwave opsin in protanopia. Using refined methods, Neitz and Neitz (1995) reexamined the numbers and ratios of genes in the Xq28 cluster in men with normal color vision. Results indicated that many men have more pigment genes on the X chromosome than had previously been suggested and that many have more than 1 longwave pigment gene.

Jagla et al. (2002) investigated the genotypic variation in 50 red-green color vision-deficient males (27 deuteranopes and 23 protanopes) of middle European ancestry who possessed multiple genes in the X-linked photopigment gene array. Spectral sensitivities of the encoded pigments were inferred from published in vitro and in vivo data, and color vision phenotype was assessed by standard anomaloscopy. Most genotypes included hybrid genes whose sequence and position and whose encoded pigment correlated exactly with the phenotype. However, a few of the protanopes had gene arrays consistent with protanomaly rather than protanopia, since 2 spectrally different pigments may be encoded by their arrays. Two of the deuteranopes had only R- and G-photopigment genes, without any detectable G/R-hybrid genes or identified mutations. About half of the protanopes possessed an upstream R/G-hybrid gene with different exon 2 coding sequences than their downstream G-pigment gene(s), which is inconsistent with published data implying that a single amino acid substitution in exon 2 can confer red-green color discrimination capacity on multigene protans by altering the optical density of the cones.

Ueyama et al. (2002) analyzed DNA in 217 Japanese males with congenital red/green color vision deficiencies. The normal genotype of a single red gene, followed by a green gene, was found in 23 subjects. Four of the 23 were from the 69 protan subject groups and 19 of the 23 were from the 148 deutan subject group. Three of the 23 subjects had missense mutations: asn94 to lys (300821.0003) in the single green gene of a deutan subject; arg330 to gln (300821.0004) in both green genes of another deutan subject; and gly338 to glu (300822.0004) in the single red gene of a protan subject. Both normal and mutant opsins were expressed in cultured COS-7 cells and visual pigments were regenerated with 11-cis-retinal. The mutations resulted in no absorbance or a low absorbance spectrum. Therefore, these 3 mutant opsins probably affected the folding process, resulting in a loss of function as a visual pigment.


Nomenclature

The terms protan, deutan, and tritan are derived from the Greek words for 'first,' 'second,' and 'third,' respectively. The terms protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia were introduced in 1896 by von Kries and Nagel to represent the absence of the first, second, and third primary colors, respectively. Farnsworth (1943) found an intimate relationship between protanomaly and protanopia, and between deuteranomaly and deuteranopia. He invented the idea of joining the classes together under the generic names of protan, deutan, and tritan. This idea was a major contribution to clarifying the classification of color vision defects.


History

(Nemoto and Murao, 1961) suggested that the order of dominance in colorblindness is normal--anomaly--anopia (Franceschetti hypothesis).


REFERENCES

  1. Brunner, W. Ueber den Vererbungsmodus der verschiedenen Typen der angeborenen Rotgruenblindheit. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Ophthal. 124: 1-52, 1932.

  2. Crone, R. A. Spectral sensitivity in color-defective subjects and heterozygous carriers. Am. J. Ophthal. 48: 231-238, 1959. [PubMed: 13670291, related citations] [Full Text]

  3. Deeb, S. S. The molecular basis of variation in human color vision. Clin. Genet. 67: 369-377, 2005. [PubMed: 15811001, related citations] [Full Text]

  4. Deeb, S. S., Lindsey, D. T., Hibiya, Y., Sanocki, E., Winderickx, J., Teller, D. Y., Motulsky, A. G. Genotype-phenotype relationships in human red/green color-vision defects: molecular and psychophysical studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 687-700, 1992. [PubMed: 1415215, related citations]

  5. Drummond-Borg, M., Deeb, S., Motulsky, A. G. Molecular basis of abnormal red-green color vision: a family with three types of color vision defects. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 43: 675-683, 1988. [PubMed: 2847528, related citations]

  6. Farnsworth, D. The Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue and dichotomy tests for colour vision. J. Ophthal. Soc. Am. 33: 568-578, 1943.

  7. Filippi, G., Rinaldi, A., Palmarino, R., Seravalli, E., Siniscalco, M. Linkage disequilibrium for two X-linked genes in Sardinia and its bearing on the statistical mapping of the human X chromosome. Genetics 86: 199-222, 1977. [PubMed: 301840, related citations] [Full Text]

  8. Franceschetti, A., Klein, D. Two families with parents of different types of red-green blindness. Acta Genet. Statist. Med. 7: 255-259, 1957. [PubMed: 13469157, related citations] [Full Text]

  9. Fraser, G. R. Estimation of the recombination fraction between the protan and deutan loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 21: 593-599, 1969. [PubMed: 5365761, related citations]

  10. Jagla, W. M., Jagle, H., Hayashi, T., Sharpe, L. T., Deeb, S. S. The molecular basis of dichromatic color vision in males with multiple red and green visual pigment genes. Hum. Molec. Genet. 11: 23-32, 2002. [PubMed: 11772996, related citations] [Full Text]

  11. Kalmus, H. Diagnosis and Genetics of Defective Colour Vision. Oxford: Pergamon Press (pub.) 1965.

  12. Kondo, T. Untersuchungen bei angeborenen Farbensinn-Anomalien. Ueber das Zustandekommen und Wesen der angeborenen Farbensinn-Anomalien. Acta Soc. Ophthal. Jpn. 45: 659, 1941.

  13. Nathans, J., Maumenee, I. H., Zrenner, E., Sadowski, B., Sharpe, L. T., Lewis, R. A., Hansen, E., Rosenberg, T., Schwartz, M., Heckenlively, J. R., Traboulsi, E., Klingaman, R., Bech-Hansen, N. T., LaRoche, G. R., Pagon, R. A., Murphey, W. H., Weleber, R. G. Genetic heterogeneity among blue-cone monochromats. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 987-1000, 1993. [PubMed: 8213841, related citations]

  14. Nathans, J., Piantanida, T. P., Eddy, R. L., Shows, T. B., Hogness, D. S. Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision. Science 232: 203-210, 1986. [PubMed: 3485310, related citations] [Full Text]

  15. Nathans, J., Thomas, D., Hogness, D. S. Molecular genetics of human color vision: the genes encoding blue, green, and red pigments. Science 232: 193-202, 1986. [PubMed: 2937147, related citations] [Full Text]

  16. Neitz, M., Neitz, J. Numbers and ratios of visual pigment genes for normal red-green color vision. Science 267: 1013-1016, 1995. [PubMed: 7863325, related citations] [Full Text]

  17. Nemoto, H., Murao, M. A genetic study of colorblindness. Jpn. J. Hum. Genet. 6: 165-173, 1961.

  18. Reyniers, E., Van Thienen, M.-N., Meire, F., De Boulle, K., Devries, K., Kestelijn, P., Willems, P. J. Gene conversion between red and defective green opsin gene in blue cone monochromacy. Genomics 29: 323-328, 1995. [PubMed: 8666378, related citations] [Full Text]

  19. Ruberg, F. L., Skene, D. J., Hanifin, J. P., Rollag, M. D., English, J., Arendt, J., Brainard, G. C. Melatonin regulation in humans with color vision deficiencies. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 81: 2980-2985, 1996. [PubMed: 8768862, related citations] [Full Text]

  20. Schmidt, I. A sign of manifest heterozygosity in carriers of color deficiency. Am. J. Optom. 32: 404-408, 1955.

  21. Simunovic, M. P., Regan, B. C., Mollon, J. D. Is color vision deficiency an advantage under scotopic conditions? Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 42: 3357-3364, 2001. [PubMed: 11726645, related citations]

  22. Siniscalco, M., Filippi, G., Latte, B. Recombination between protan and deutan genes: data on their relative positions in respect of the G6PD locus. Nature 204: 1062-1064, 1964. [PubMed: 14243382, related citations] [Full Text]

  23. Sloan, L. L. Evaluation of the Tokyo Medical College color vision test. Am. J. Ophthal. 52: 650-659, 1961. [PubMed: 13913884, related citations] [Full Text]

  24. Thuline, H. C., Hodgkin, W. E., Fraser, G. R., Motulsky, A. G. Genetics of protan and deutan color-vision anomalies: an instructive family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 21: 581-592, 1969. [PubMed: 5365760, related citations]

  25. Ueyama, H., Kuwayama, S., Imai, H., Tanabe, S., Oda, S., Nishida, Y., Wada, A., Shichida, Y., Yamade, S. Novel missense mutations in red/green opsin genes in congenital color-vision deficiencies. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 294: 205-209, 2002. [PubMed: 12051694, related citations] [Full Text]

  26. Vanderdonck, R., Verriest, G. Femme protanomale et heterozygote mixte (genes de la protanomalie et de la deuteranopie en position de repulsion) ayant deux fils deuteranopes, un fils protanomal et deux fils normaux. Biotypologie 21: 110-120, 1960.

  27. von Kries, J., Nagel, W. Ueber den Einfluss von Lichtstaerke und Adaptation auf das Sehen des Dichromaten (Gruenblinden). Ztschr. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorg. 12: 1-38, 1896.

  28. von Planta, P. Die Haeufigkeit der angeborenen Farbensinnstoerungen bei Knaben und Maedchen und ihre Feststellung durch die ueblichen klinischen Proben. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthal. 120: 253-281, 1928.

  29. Waaler, G. H. Ueber die Erblichkeitsverhaeltnisse der verschiedenen Arten von angeborener Rotgruenblindheit. Ztschr. F. Indukt. Abstammungs-u. Vererbungsl. 45: 279-333, 1927.

  30. Waaler, G. H. Heredity of two normal types of colour vision. Nature 218: 688-689, 1968. [PubMed: 5655963, related citations] [Full Text]

  31. Winderickx, J., Lindsey, D. T., Sanocki, E., Teller, D. Y., Motulsky, A. G., Deeb, S. S. Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in colour matching. Nature 356: 431-433, 1992. [PubMed: 1557123, related citations] [Full Text]


George E. Tiller - updated : 9/12/2002
Victor A. McKusick - updated : 8/12/2002
Jane Kelly - updated : 7/2/2002
Victor A. McKusick - updated : 3/27/1997
John A. Phillips, III - updated : 9/26/1996
Creation Date:
Victor A. McKusick : 6/4/1986
carol : 09/13/2010
carol : 9/13/2010
carol : 9/3/2010
carol : 8/30/2010
terry : 8/13/2010
carol : 8/13/2010
carol : 3/17/2004
cwells : 9/12/2002
cwells : 9/12/2002
terry : 8/12/2002
terry : 8/12/2002
mgross : 7/2/2002
carol : 2/20/2001
carol : 9/16/1999
alopez : 7/1/1998
mark : 3/27/1997
carol : 9/26/1996
mark : 1/30/1996
terry : 1/29/1996
carol : 3/7/1995
davew : 8/24/1994
pfoster : 5/12/1994
mimadm : 4/17/1994
warfield : 3/11/1994
carol : 12/13/1993

# 303900

COLORBLINDNESS, PARTIAL, PROTAN SERIES; CBP


Alternative titles; symbols

PROTANOPIA
RED COLORBLINDNESS


Other entities represented in this entry:

PROTANOMALY, INCLUDED

SNOMEDCT: 51445007;   ICD10CM: H53.54;   DO: 13910;  


Phenotype-Gene Relationships

Location Phenotype Phenotype
MIM number
Inheritance Phenotype
mapping key
Gene/Locus Gene/Locus
MIM number
Xq28 Colorblindness, protan 303900 X-linked 3 OPN1LW 300822

TEXT

A number sign (#) is used with this entry because protan colorblindness is caused by mutation in the OPN1LW gene (300822), which encodes red cone pigment.


Description

Normal color vision in humans is trichromatic, being based on 3 classes of cone that are maximally sensitive to light at approximately 420 nm (blue cones; 613522), 530 nm (green cones; 300821), and 560 nm (red cones; 300822). Comparison by neural circuits of light absorption by the 3 classes of cone photoreceptors allows perception of red, yellow, green, and blue colors individually or in various combinations. Dichromatic color vision is severely defective color vision based on the use of only 2 types of photoreceptors, blue plus green (protanopia) or blue plus red (deuteranopia; see 303800). Anomalous trichromacy is trichromatic color vision based on a blue, green, and an anomalous red-like photoreceptor (protanomaly), or a blue, red, and an anomalous green-like photoreceptor (deuteranomaly). The color vision defect is generally mild but may in certain cases be severe. Common variation in red-green color vision exists among both normal and color-deficient individuals (review by Deeb, 2005).


Clinical Features

Studies using reflection densitometry and retinal microbeam experiments showed that 2 different pigments mediate red and green sensitivity. These are located in the cones, each cone containing only 1 type of pigment (Waaler, 1968).

Simunovic et al. (2001) examined red-green color-deficient subjects, a small sample of monochromats, and age-matched color-normal control subjects to determine whether color vision deficiency confers a selective advantage under scotopic conditions. They found no evidence that red-green color deficiency or monochromatism confers a selective advantage under scotopic conditions, including dark adaptation, scotopic visual field sensitivity, or performance on a scotopic perceptual task.


Diagnosis

The Nagel anomaloscope, used in determination of the type of colorblindness, consists of a viewing tube with a circular bipartite field, one half illuminated with yellow and the other half with a mixture of green and red. The yellow half is not variable except in brightness. The other half can be varied continuously from red to green. The subject's color sense is tested by having him mix colors in the variable half-field until he achieves a subjective match to the yellow field. Certain color combinations are considered normal whereas specific differences from the normal indicate the type and degree of anomalous color vision.

Ishihara plates alone are unreliable in distinguishing deutan and protan types. Although the Nagel anomaloscope is the 'last court of appeal' in making the differentiation, it is expensive, time-consuming, difficult for unsophisticated subjects, and, of course, not usable 'in the field.' Two 'book' tests, the Tokyo Medical College Test and the AO-HRR (Hardy-Rand-Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plates, especially when used together, probably represent the methods that are both the easiest and the most reliable available (Sloan, 1961). Identification of a small proportion of deutero-heterozygotes is possible by means of the luminosity quotient, determined by a modification of the Nagel anomaloscope designed by Crone. Most cases of proto-heterozygotes can be identified as such with a high degree of certainty using this method.


Molecular Genetics

Several early observations supported a 2-locus model for the common type of red-green colorblindness. First, the data on relative frequency of colorblindness in males and females collected in Norway by Waaler (1927) and in Switzerland by von Planta (1928) agreed with the values predicted by a 2-locus theory. Second, females, who by the nature of the color vision defect in their sons are known to carry genes for both types of colorblindness, usually do not show a defect in color vision (Brunner, 1932; Kondo, 1941; Franceschetti and Klein, 1957). Third, the pedigrees of Vanderdonck and Verriest (1960) and Siniscalco et al. (1964) indicated independent assortment of deutan and protan genes among the offspring of a doubly heterozygous female. And fourth, Filippi et al. (1977) observed linkage disequilibrium for G6PD/protan but not for G6PD/deutan.

Nathans et al. (1986, 1986) determined that whereas there is a single red pigment gene, green pigment genes vary in number among persons with normal color vision. The multiple green pigment genes are arranged in a head-to-tail tandem array. The existence of multiple green pigment genes in tandem array may explain why deutan colorblindness is more frequent than protan colorblindness. Furthermore, nonhomologous pairing and unequal crossing-over can explain the development of colorblindness. Gene conversion may also be involved. The green pigment genes vary in restriction pattern.

Drummond-Borg et al. (1988) demonstrated the use of molecular methods for defining the defects in red-green color vision in a family carrying 3 types of defects: protanomaly, deuteranomaly, and protanopia. In the protanomalous and protanopic males, the normal red pigment gene was replaced by a 5-prime red--3-prime green fusion gene. The protanomalous male had more red pigment DNA in his fusion gene than did the more severely affected protanopic individual. The deuteranomalous individual had 4 green pigment genes and one 5-prime green--3-prime red fusion gene. The findings support the proposal that most red-green color-vision defects arise as a result of unequal crossing-over between the red and green pigment genes. Differences in severity of color-vision defects associated with fusion genes appear to be the result of differences in crossover sites between the red and green pigment genes. In this family, 2 compound heterozygotes for color-vision defects who tested as normal by anomaloscopy were found to carry abnormal fusion genes. The explanation for normal color vision appears to have been the presence, in addition, of a normal red pigment gene on one chromosome and at least 1 normal green pigment gene on the other.

In a study of genotype-phenotype relationships in 64 color-defective males, Deeb et al. (1992) found that in most there was either a deletion of the green-pigment gene or the formation of 5-prime red-green hybrid genes or 5-prime green-red hybrid genes. Protan color-vision defects appeared always associated with 5-prime red-green hybrid genes. Carriers of single red-green hybrid genes with fusion in introns 1-4 were protanopes. However, carriers of hybrid genes with red-green fusions in introns 2, 3, or 4 in the presence of additional normal green genes manifested as either protanopes or protanomalous trichromats, with the majority being protanomalous. Deutan defects were associated with green-pigment gene deletions, with 5-prime green-red hybrid genes, or, rarely, with 5-prime green-red-green hybrid genes. Complete green-pigment gene deletions or green-red fusions in intron 1 were usually associated with deuteranopia, although Deeb et al. (1992) unexpectedly found 3 subjects with a single red-pigment gene and no green-pigment genes to be deuteranomalous trichromats. All but one of the other deuteranomalous subjects had green-red hybrid genes with intron 1, 2, 3, or 4 fusions, as well as several normal green-pigment genes. Amino acid differences in exon 5 largely determine whether a hybrid gene will be more redlike or more greenlike in phenotype. When phenotypic color-vision defects exist, the kind of defect, protan or deutan, can be predicted by molecular analysis. Red-green hybrid genes are probably always associated with protan color-vision defects, while the presence of green-red hybrid genes may not always manifest phenotypically with color-vision defects. Among a group of 129 Caucasian males who had been recruited as volunteers for a vision study, Deeb et al. (1992) found 4 subjects who had 5-prime green-red hybrid genes in addition to normal red- and green-pigment genes and demonstrated normal color vision as determined by anomaloscopy. It may be that green-red hybrid genes in a more distal, 3-prime position of a gene array that includes one or more normal green genes may not be expressed sufficiently to affect color vision measurably.

Although there are 15 amino acid differences between the MW (green) and LW (red) opsins, the greater part of the spectral shift in sensitivity is the result of substitutions at sites 180, 277, and 285, with 5 other sites having smaller effects. Site 180 (see 300822.0002) is polymorphic in both MW and LW opsin genes. The middlewave opsin is missing or defective in deuteranopia and the longwave opsin in protanopia. Using refined methods, Neitz and Neitz (1995) reexamined the numbers and ratios of genes in the Xq28 cluster in men with normal color vision. Results indicated that many men have more pigment genes on the X chromosome than had previously been suggested and that many have more than 1 longwave pigment gene.

Jagla et al. (2002) investigated the genotypic variation in 50 red-green color vision-deficient males (27 deuteranopes and 23 protanopes) of middle European ancestry who possessed multiple genes in the X-linked photopigment gene array. Spectral sensitivities of the encoded pigments were inferred from published in vitro and in vivo data, and color vision phenotype was assessed by standard anomaloscopy. Most genotypes included hybrid genes whose sequence and position and whose encoded pigment correlated exactly with the phenotype. However, a few of the protanopes had gene arrays consistent with protanomaly rather than protanopia, since 2 spectrally different pigments may be encoded by their arrays. Two of the deuteranopes had only R- and G-photopigment genes, without any detectable G/R-hybrid genes or identified mutations. About half of the protanopes possessed an upstream R/G-hybrid gene with different exon 2 coding sequences than their downstream G-pigment gene(s), which is inconsistent with published data implying that a single amino acid substitution in exon 2 can confer red-green color discrimination capacity on multigene protans by altering the optical density of the cones.

Ueyama et al. (2002) analyzed DNA in 217 Japanese males with congenital red/green color vision deficiencies. The normal genotype of a single red gene, followed by a green gene, was found in 23 subjects. Four of the 23 were from the 69 protan subject groups and 19 of the 23 were from the 148 deutan subject group. Three of the 23 subjects had missense mutations: asn94 to lys (300821.0003) in the single green gene of a deutan subject; arg330 to gln (300821.0004) in both green genes of another deutan subject; and gly338 to glu (300822.0004) in the single red gene of a protan subject. Both normal and mutant opsins were expressed in cultured COS-7 cells and visual pigments were regenerated with 11-cis-retinal. The mutations resulted in no absorbance or a low absorbance spectrum. Therefore, these 3 mutant opsins probably affected the folding process, resulting in a loss of function as a visual pigment.


Nomenclature

The terms protan, deutan, and tritan are derived from the Greek words for 'first,' 'second,' and 'third,' respectively. The terms protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia were introduced in 1896 by von Kries and Nagel to represent the absence of the first, second, and third primary colors, respectively. Farnsworth (1943) found an intimate relationship between protanomaly and protanopia, and between deuteranomaly and deuteranopia. He invented the idea of joining the classes together under the generic names of protan, deutan, and tritan. This idea was a major contribution to clarifying the classification of color vision defects.


History

(Nemoto and Murao, 1961) suggested that the order of dominance in colorblindness is normal--anomaly--anopia (Franceschetti hypothesis).


See Also:

Crone (1959); Fraser (1969); Kalmus (1965); Nathans et al. (1993); Reyniers et al. (1995); Ruberg et al. (1996); Schmidt (1955); Thuline et al. (1969); von Kries and Nagel (1896); Winderickx et al. (1992)

REFERENCES

  1. Brunner, W. Ueber den Vererbungsmodus der verschiedenen Typen der angeborenen Rotgruenblindheit. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Ophthal. 124: 1-52, 1932.

  2. Crone, R. A. Spectral sensitivity in color-defective subjects and heterozygous carriers. Am. J. Ophthal. 48: 231-238, 1959. [PubMed: 13670291] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(59)91239-5]

  3. Deeb, S. S. The molecular basis of variation in human color vision. Clin. Genet. 67: 369-377, 2005. [PubMed: 15811001] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00343.x]

  4. Deeb, S. S., Lindsey, D. T., Hibiya, Y., Sanocki, E., Winderickx, J., Teller, D. Y., Motulsky, A. G. Genotype-phenotype relationships in human red/green color-vision defects: molecular and psychophysical studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 687-700, 1992. [PubMed: 1415215]

  5. Drummond-Borg, M., Deeb, S., Motulsky, A. G. Molecular basis of abnormal red-green color vision: a family with three types of color vision defects. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 43: 675-683, 1988. [PubMed: 2847528]

  6. Farnsworth, D. The Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue and dichotomy tests for colour vision. J. Ophthal. Soc. Am. 33: 568-578, 1943.

  7. Filippi, G., Rinaldi, A., Palmarino, R., Seravalli, E., Siniscalco, M. Linkage disequilibrium for two X-linked genes in Sardinia and its bearing on the statistical mapping of the human X chromosome. Genetics 86: 199-222, 1977. [PubMed: 301840] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/86.1.199]

  8. Franceschetti, A., Klein, D. Two families with parents of different types of red-green blindness. Acta Genet. Statist. Med. 7: 255-259, 1957. [PubMed: 13469157] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1159/000150979]

  9. Fraser, G. R. Estimation of the recombination fraction between the protan and deutan loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 21: 593-599, 1969. [PubMed: 5365761]

  10. Jagla, W. M., Jagle, H., Hayashi, T., Sharpe, L. T., Deeb, S. S. The molecular basis of dichromatic color vision in males with multiple red and green visual pigment genes. Hum. Molec. Genet. 11: 23-32, 2002. [PubMed: 11772996] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.1.23]

  11. Kalmus, H. Diagnosis and Genetics of Defective Colour Vision. Oxford: Pergamon Press (pub.) 1965.

  12. Kondo, T. Untersuchungen bei angeborenen Farbensinn-Anomalien. Ueber das Zustandekommen und Wesen der angeborenen Farbensinn-Anomalien. Acta Soc. Ophthal. Jpn. 45: 659, 1941.

  13. Nathans, J., Maumenee, I. H., Zrenner, E., Sadowski, B., Sharpe, L. T., Lewis, R. A., Hansen, E., Rosenberg, T., Schwartz, M., Heckenlively, J. R., Traboulsi, E., Klingaman, R., Bech-Hansen, N. T., LaRoche, G. R., Pagon, R. A., Murphey, W. H., Weleber, R. G. Genetic heterogeneity among blue-cone monochromats. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 987-1000, 1993. [PubMed: 8213841]

  14. Nathans, J., Piantanida, T. P., Eddy, R. L., Shows, T. B., Hogness, D. S. Molecular genetics of inherited variation in human color vision. Science 232: 203-210, 1986. [PubMed: 3485310] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3485310]

  15. Nathans, J., Thomas, D., Hogness, D. S. Molecular genetics of human color vision: the genes encoding blue, green, and red pigments. Science 232: 193-202, 1986. [PubMed: 2937147] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2937147]

  16. Neitz, M., Neitz, J. Numbers and ratios of visual pigment genes for normal red-green color vision. Science 267: 1013-1016, 1995. [PubMed: 7863325] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7863325]

  17. Nemoto, H., Murao, M. A genetic study of colorblindness. Jpn. J. Hum. Genet. 6: 165-173, 1961.

  18. Reyniers, E., Van Thienen, M.-N., Meire, F., De Boulle, K., Devries, K., Kestelijn, P., Willems, P. J. Gene conversion between red and defective green opsin gene in blue cone monochromacy. Genomics 29: 323-328, 1995. [PubMed: 8666378] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1995.9998]

  19. Ruberg, F. L., Skene, D. J., Hanifin, J. P., Rollag, M. D., English, J., Arendt, J., Brainard, G. C. Melatonin regulation in humans with color vision deficiencies. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 81: 2980-2985, 1996. [PubMed: 8768862] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.81.8.8768862]

  20. Schmidt, I. A sign of manifest heterozygosity in carriers of color deficiency. Am. J. Optom. 32: 404-408, 1955.

  21. Simunovic, M. P., Regan, B. C., Mollon, J. D. Is color vision deficiency an advantage under scotopic conditions? Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 42: 3357-3364, 2001. [PubMed: 11726645]

  22. Siniscalco, M., Filippi, G., Latte, B. Recombination between protan and deutan genes: data on their relative positions in respect of the G6PD locus. Nature 204: 1062-1064, 1964. [PubMed: 14243382] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1038/2041062a0]

  23. Sloan, L. L. Evaluation of the Tokyo Medical College color vision test. Am. J. Ophthal. 52: 650-659, 1961. [PubMed: 13913884] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(61)90150-7]

  24. Thuline, H. C., Hodgkin, W. E., Fraser, G. R., Motulsky, A. G. Genetics of protan and deutan color-vision anomalies: an instructive family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 21: 581-592, 1969. [PubMed: 5365760]

  25. Ueyama, H., Kuwayama, S., Imai, H., Tanabe, S., Oda, S., Nishida, Y., Wada, A., Shichida, Y., Yamade, S. Novel missense mutations in red/green opsin genes in congenital color-vision deficiencies. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 294: 205-209, 2002. [PubMed: 12051694] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00458-8]

  26. Vanderdonck, R., Verriest, G. Femme protanomale et heterozygote mixte (genes de la protanomalie et de la deuteranopie en position de repulsion) ayant deux fils deuteranopes, un fils protanomal et deux fils normaux. Biotypologie 21: 110-120, 1960.

  27. von Kries, J., Nagel, W. Ueber den Einfluss von Lichtstaerke und Adaptation auf das Sehen des Dichromaten (Gruenblinden). Ztschr. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorg. 12: 1-38, 1896.

  28. von Planta, P. Die Haeufigkeit der angeborenen Farbensinnstoerungen bei Knaben und Maedchen und ihre Feststellung durch die ueblichen klinischen Proben. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthal. 120: 253-281, 1928.

  29. Waaler, G. H. Ueber die Erblichkeitsverhaeltnisse der verschiedenen Arten von angeborener Rotgruenblindheit. Ztschr. F. Indukt. Abstammungs-u. Vererbungsl. 45: 279-333, 1927.

  30. Waaler, G. H. Heredity of two normal types of colour vision. Nature 218: 688-689, 1968. [PubMed: 5655963] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1038/218688a0]

  31. Winderickx, J., Lindsey, D. T., Sanocki, E., Teller, D. Y., Motulsky, A. G., Deeb, S. S. Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in colour matching. Nature 356: 431-433, 1992. [PubMed: 1557123] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1038/356431a0]


Contributors:
George E. Tiller - updated : 9/12/2002
Victor A. McKusick - updated : 8/12/2002
Jane Kelly - updated : 7/2/2002
Victor A. McKusick - updated : 3/27/1997
John A. Phillips, III - updated : 9/26/1996

Creation Date:
Victor A. McKusick : 6/4/1986

Edit History:
carol : 09/13/2010
carol : 9/13/2010
carol : 9/3/2010
carol : 8/30/2010
terry : 8/13/2010
carol : 8/13/2010
carol : 3/17/2004
cwells : 9/12/2002
cwells : 9/12/2002
terry : 8/12/2002
terry : 8/12/2002
mgross : 7/2/2002
carol : 2/20/2001
carol : 9/16/1999
alopez : 7/1/1998
mark : 3/27/1997
carol : 9/26/1996
mark : 1/30/1996
terry : 1/29/1996
carol : 3/7/1995
davew : 8/24/1994
pfoster : 5/12/1994
mimadm : 4/17/1994
warfield : 3/11/1994
carol : 12/13/1993